4. Three Issues Presented

At the time the April 7, 2009 proposed decision was mailed, a single issue was before us:

· should the residue of Reparations Funds A and B, which are not subject to escheat, be distributed to the TCPF as UCAN proposed?

Subsequently, AT&T has raised the following additional issues:

· should Ordering Paragraph 1 of D.08-02-015, which directed the claims administrator to pay UCAN's second intervenor compensation award from the residue of Fund B (as AT&T's October 15, 2007 status report requested), be modified to instead authorize reimbursement to AT&T since AT&T paid that award, in the amount of $175,171.91, to UCAN directly prior to the issuance of D.08-02-015?

· should AT&T be reimbursed $58,536.22 (based on figures available as of May 31, 2009) from the $600,000 advanced to cover the costs of the claims administrator?

We dispose of AT&T's issues first and then address distribution of the residue of Funds A and B.