6. Comments on Proposed Decision
The proposed decision of the assigned Commissioner in this matter was mailed to the parties in accordance with Public Utilities Code Section 311 and Rule 14.2(a) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure. Comments were received on July 5, 2007, from AT&T, CALTEL, Small LECs, Joint Commenters, Consumer Federation, Cricket and MetroPCS, CTIA, DRA, Greenlining, LIF, T-Mobile, SureWest, TURN, Verizon California, and Verizon Wireless. Reply comments were received on July 10, 2007, from AT&T, Small LECs, Joint Commenters, Frontier,248 Consumer Federation, Cricket and MetroPCS, CTIA, DRA, Greenlining, LIF, T-Mobile, SureWest, Verizon California, and Verizon Wireless.
In addition to the comments that we have addressed explicitly, we have reviewed all the comments and replies and revised the decision as warranted.
248 Frontier is comprised of Citizens Telecommunications Company of California Inc. dba Frontier Communications of California, Citizens Telecommunications Company of Tuolumne dba Frontier Communications of Tuolumne, and Citizens Telecommunications Company of the Golden State dba Frontier Communications of the Golden State.
