| Word Document PDF Document |
ALJ/KOT/sid * DRAFT Agenda ID #5021
Quasi-legislative
11/18/2005 Item 44
Decision DRAFT DECISION OF ALJ KOTZ (Mailed 10/18/2005)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Rulemaking to Set Hourly Rates for Purposes of Calculating Intervenor Compensation Awards, Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 1801 and Following, for Work Performed in Calendar Year 2005. |
Rulemaking 04-10-010 (Filed October 7, 2004) |
FINAL DECISION ON 2005 RATES FOR
INTERVENORS' REPRESENTATIVES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
FINAL DECISION ON 2005 RATES FOR
INTERVENORS' REPRESENTATIVES.....................................................2
1. Introduction 2
2. Background 2
3. Development of the Record 3
4. Conceptual Issues 3
5. Currently Authorized Hourly Rates 3
6. Intervenors' Proposed Rates for 2005 3
7. Authorized Hourly Rates for Work Performed in 2005 3
8. Future Hourly Rate Updates 3
9. Confidentiality of Compensation Data 3
10. Intervenor Status in this Rulemaking 3
11. Comments on Draft Decision 3
12. Assignment of Proceeding 3
Findings of Fact................................................................................. 3
Conclusions of Law............................................................................ 3
ORDER............................................................................................ 3
ATTACHMENT A - Intervenors' Proposed Rates for Attorneys: 2005
Intervenors' Proposed Rates for Experts: 2005
1. Introduction
In today's decision, we approve principles to govern hourly rates for intervenors' representatives.1 We base these rates on (1) compensation data provided by utilities regarding the in-house and outside representatives who appear on their behalf before this Commission, and (2) the information provided by intervenors regarding the training and experience of their representatives. These rates are presumptively reasonable for calculating awards to intervenors for qualifying hours worked in calendar year 2005.
1 "Representatives" for purposes of today's decision includes anyone with expertise that might be useful in presenting evidence or argument at the Commission. Thus, the term is not limited to lawyers but includes engineers, accountants, and economists, among others.