Word Document PDF Document |
COM/MP1/gd2 Date of Issuance 5/6/2011
Decision 11-05-019 May 5, 2011
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Order Instituting Rulemaking for the Purpose of Reviewing and Potentially Amending General Order 156 and to Consider Other Measures to Promote Economic Efficiencies of an Expanded Supplier Base and to Examine the Composition of the Utilities' Workforce. |
Rulemaking 09-07-027 (Filed July 30, 2009) |
DECISION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL ORDER 156
DECISION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL ORDER 156 11
2. Background and Procedural History 44
3. The Scope of the Proceeding 77
3.3. Other Procedural Matters 1212
4. Post en banc Technical Assistance Proposals and Comments 1313
4.1. The Joint Utilities Proposal 1414
4.2. The Two Chambers Joint Proposal 1515
5. Discussion of Other Issues 2424
5.1. Target Goals and Aspirational Interim Steps 2525
5.2. Changes to Annual Reporting 3131
5.3. Prime Supplier Programs 3737
5.4. Improved Spend in Underutilized Areas 3939
5.5. Barriers to Competing 4545
5.6. Capacity Building-Unbundling Large Contracts and Mentoring 4848
5.7. Transparency of Procurement and the Bid Process 5252
5.8. Supplier Clearinghouse Activities and Duties 5555
5.9. Community-Based Organizations 6161
5.10. Commission Oversight 6363
7. Comments on Proposed Decision 6868
ATTACHMENT A - Multi-Tiered Assistance and Capacity Building Program
ATTACHMENT B - Summary of Aspirational Interim Steps Towards GO 156 Target Goals Identified By Reporting Companies
ATTACHMENT C - Amendments to General Order 156
DECISION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL ORDER 156
General Order (GO) 156 was adopted by the Commission in 1986 to promote greater competition among utility suppliers by expanding the available supplier base and to encourage greater economic opportunity for women, minority, and disabled veteran owned businesses historically left out of utility procurement. The six largest reporting companies covered by GO 156 have vibrant outreach programs to increase participation by small and diverse businesses, and have exceeded GO 156's initial target goals. Other companies have had much less success.
This decision is the result of nearly two years of avid engagement by the Commission and its supplier diversity program staff, utility companies subject to GO 156 reporting, community groups, and diverse businesses. The rulemaking undertook an assessment of current utility supplier diversity programs, including community-based views of their successes and failures, with the goal of recommending actions by the parties and amendments to GO 156 that would improve results. The parties thoroughly aired their views, enhanced their working relationships, and committed to working together better than ever before to achieve the aims of GO 156.
In this decision, the Commission strongly reaffirms its support of the policy goals of GO 156, particularly the economic benefits to ratepayers and communities. In an effort to enhance the transparency and accountability of existing utility supplier diversity programs, the decision makes several amendments to GO 156. These amendments require: (1) electronic filing of the GO 156 annual reports, (2) posting of the reports on the Commission's website, (3) separate reporting of electric procurement spending, (4) reporting of the total number of women-, minority-, and disabled veteran-owned businesses enterprises (WMDVBEs) that received direct spend in a reporting period, (5) reporting of amounts spent by utilities on technical assistance, and (6) periodic random audits of the GO 156 reports. Other amendments are made to GO 156 to conform with the statutory changes enacted in Assembly Bill 2758,1 including the express inclusion of wireless providers (which the Commission believes are already covered as a telephone corporation), reporting of renewable energy procurement and other areas, identification of WMDVBEs with a majority of the workforce in California, and use of the California Department of General Services criteria for Disabled Veteran-owned Business Enterprises.2 Furthermore, it amends GO 156 to require annual en banc hearings by the Commission to review with utility executives the program's progress, commitments, and initiatives and to hear community comments.
In addition, the decision makes numerous findings of fact and recommendations about aspects of utility supplier diversity programs, the role of the Supplier Clearinghouse, and activities by community-based organizations and the Commission's Utility Supplier Diversity Program. These findings and recommendations reflect the Commission's review of the parties' positions and may provide a road map to continuing cooperation between all those committed to improvement of utility supplier diversity programs.
1 Chapter 475, Statutes of 2010.
2 This clarifies and affirms existing practice.