Conclusion

Since the complainants are challenging the interpretation of § 331(h), as contained in various Commission decisions and approved tariffs, the complainants should have filed timely applications for rehearing of the decisions alleged to have violated § 331(h). The complainants' failure to timely apply for rehearing of these decisions, and the provisions of § 841(c), prevent us from revisiting our determination of which small commercial customers of SCE should be eligible for the 10% rate reduction. In addition, the record in the various proceedings and our decisions clearly demonstrate that no misrepresentations occurred as alleged by the complainants. Accordingly, the complaint should be dismissed with prejudice.