Word Document PDF Document

STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

505 VAN NESS AVENUE

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298

March 5, 2003

TO: ALL PARTIES OF RECORD IN RULEMAKING 99-10-025

Decision 03-02-068 is being mailed without the Concurring Opinion of President Michael R. Peevey. The Concurring Opinion will be mailed separately.

Very truly yours,

/s/ ANGELA K. MINKIN   

ANGELA K. MINKIN, Chief

Administrative Law Judge

ANG:tcg

Attachment

COM/LYN/tcg Mailed 3/5/2003

Decision 03-02-068 February 27, 2003

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Order Instituting Rulemaking into Distributed Generation.

Rulemaking 99-10-025

(Filed October 21, 1999)

O P I N I O N

(See Appendix A for List of Appearances.)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

O P I N I O N 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(Continued)

Findings of Fact 76

Conclusions of Law 79

O R D E R 81

Appendix A - List of Appearances

O P I N I O N

1. Summary

This decision completes our rulemaking and establishes policies for ownership and operation of distributed generation and their integration into utility planning and operation of the distribution grid. We find that there is no need to place restrictions on ownership of distributed generation units. The technology of electricity distribution, however, necessitates that a distributed generation owner will only be eligible for compensation for deferring distribution system upgrades in limited circumstances, described herein, and only if the distributed generator offers physical assurance. Similarly, since almost every retail sale will utilize both the distribution and transmission networks (even those that appear to stay within a single circuit), we do not adopt a distribution-only tariff.

The nature of this new technology and its likely uses obviates the need to make any changes to rate design to accommodate distributed generation at this time. Nevertheless, we do allow the utilities to establish memorandum accounts to track distributed generation implementation costs that cannot be attributed to specific distributed generation projects and are not part of the utilities' existing budgets.

We do not adopt a mass marketing information campaign about distributed generation, but rather a multi-pronged education effort directed to those considering a distributed generation installation.

To allow us to consider ongoing issues, we state our intent to open a new rulemaking - related to distributed generation.

Top Of PageNext PageGo To First Page