The CMS summarizes the status of issues as of November 2, 1999. Many of the original disagreements between ORA and the utilities have been resolved through review of additional documents, records or updated information. This status is summarized below:
ISSUE |
POSITIONS OF PARTIES2 | ||
Shareholder |
(millions) | ||
UTILITY |
ORA |
PRAHL-INDEPENDENT REVIEWER | |
PY 1994-3RD Earnings Claim for Rates in 20003 | |||
PG&E |
$5.40 $20.20 life cycle |
agrees agrees |
not applicable (N/A) |
SDG&E |
$2.81 $8.190 lifecycle |
agrees agrees |
N/A |
SoCal |
$0.725 $2.898 lifecycle |
agrees agrees |
N/A |
Edison |
$1.416 $4.974 lifecycle |
agrees agrees |
N/A |
PY 1997-2nd Earnings Claim for Rates in 20003 | |||
PG&E |
$6.02 $31.54 lifecycle |
settled settled |
agrees agrees |
SDG&E |
$3.955 $16.093 |
settled settled settled |
advised ORA advised ORA |
Edison |
$2.224 lifecycle $15.397 lifecycle |
settled settled |
advised ORA accepted indep. reviewer recom. Includes IEEI $8.051 lifecycle And CEEI $5.516 lifecycle |
SoCal |
$0.716 $2.865 lifecycle |
agrees agrees |
N/A N/A |
PY 1998 First Year Earnings Claim for pre-1998 Program | |||
PG&E4 |
$4.25 in 2000 $4.25 in 2001 lifecycle |
settled settled |
N/A |
SDG&E |
N/A |
||
SoCal |
$0.353 in 2000 $1.411 |
settled settled |
adopts indep. reviewer recom. |
Edison |
$0.241 in 2000 $0.964 lifecycle |
agrees agrees |
N/A N/A |
The other issue that had not been resolved earlier in the CMS is the PY 2000 LIEE shareholder incentive mechanism, which the parties later resolved in the Joint Recommendation. We address the Joint Recommendation in a later section of this decision.
PY 1998 LIEE First Earnings Claim3 5 | |||
PG&E |
$0.110 in 2000 $0.220 lifecycle |
agrees agrees |
|
SDG&E |
$0.041958 in 2000 $0.08397 lifecycle |
agrees agrees |
|
Edison |
$0.1215 in 2000 $0.243 lifecycle |
agrees agrees |
|
SoCal |
$0.108 in 2000 $0.216 lifecycle |
agrees agrees |