Word Document PDF Document

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

505 VAN NESS AVENUE

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298

January 16, 2004 Alternate to Agenda ID #2881

TO: PARTIES OF RECORD IN APPLICATION 02-02-012

Enclosed is the Alternate Proposed Decision of Commissioner Lynch to the Proposed Decision of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) DeBerry.

When the Commission acts on the draft or alternate decision, it may adopt all or part of it as written, amend or modify it, or set aside and prepare its own decision. Only when the Commission acts does the decision become binding on the parties.

Public Utilities Code Section 311(e) requires that an alternate to a draft decision be served on all parties, and be subject to public review and comment prior to a vote of the Commission. Rule 77.6(d) provides that comments on the alternate draft decision be filed at least seven days before the Commission meeting.

Comments on the alternate decision must be filed and served January 28, 2004. Reply comments are due February 4, 2004.

Pursuant to Rule 77.3 comments shall not exceed 15 pages. Finally, comments must be served separately on the ALJ and the assigned Commissioner, and for that purpose I suggest hand delivery, overnight mail, or other expeditious method of service. Please also provide an electronic copy of the comments and reply comments to Trina Horner at tah@cpuc.ca.gov.

   

Angela K. Minkin, Chief Administrative Law Judge

ANG:epg

Attachment

COM/LYN/epg ALTERNATE DRAFT Agenda ID # ______

Decision ALTERNATE PROPOSED DECISION OF COMMISIONER LYNCH (Mailed 1/16/2004)

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of the Application of Southwest Gas Corporation for Authority to Increase Rates in San Bernardino, Placer, El Dorado, and Nevada Counties, California.

Application 02-02-012

(Filed February 13, 2002)

OPINION REGARDING PROPOSED
GENERAL RATE INCREASE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Pages

OPINION REGARDING PROPOSED
GENERAL RATE INCREASES

1. Summary

This decision adopts 2003 general rate increases of approximately $1.73 million and $3.47 million for Southwest Gas Corporation's Southern and Northern California Divisions respectively. The revenue requirement increase in the Northern California Division will be phased in during 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. As a result, 80% of the increase will be included in rates for 2003; 10% in 2004; 5% in 2005 and 5% in 2006. The phase-in of these increases recognizes the current economic climate, and the ability of customers to bear both these increases and potential increases in the cost of gas.

The adopted increases represent approximately 30% of Southwest's requested increase in Southern California, and 79% of the requested increase in Northern California.1 This decision also provides for attrition increases in Southern and Northern California in 2004, 2005 and 2006, that protect against labor and non-labor inflation, and inclusion of the Truckee Operational Center in Southwest's Northern California 2004 attrition year revenue requirements. Southwest is also authorized to amortize amounts currently recorded in the Revenue Recovery Shortfall Memorandum Account in rates for 2003 and 2004. In addition, this decision adopts a revenue balancing account that protects ratepayers against over-collections, and Southwest against under-collections due to differences between forecasted sales and actual sales.

These rate increases are the first General Rate Increases authorized for Southwest since its last General Rate Case in 1995, and are a result of increasing costs for both labor and non-labor expenses, and greater plant investment, that have occurred during the last eight years. The adopted revenue requirements are based on the use of a 2003 test year, and an overall rate of return of 8.93% on Southwest's rate base investment. As explained in our opinion, we have not adopted recommendations by other parties for a refund of postretirement benefits other than pensions. We adopt a refund of gas purchase costs that occurred in winter 2000-2001 of $12.18 million. Finally, we defer certain issues regarding other investments, and the future of the trust account for funding future retiree's benefits to Southwest's next general rate case.

1 During the proceeding, Southwest reduced its requested revenue requirement increases from $8.4 to $5.7 million in Southern California, and from $5.5 million to $4.4 million in Northern California.

Top Of PageNext PageGo To First Page