Word Document |
STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298
March 6, 2001
TO: PARTIES OF RECORD IN APPLICATION 00-05-013
This is the proposed decision of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Galvin, previously designated as the principal hearing officer in this proceeding. It will be on the Commission's agenda at the next regular meeting, which is scheduled for April 19, 2001. This matter was categorized as ratesetting and is subject to Pub. Util. Code § 1701.3(c). Pursuant to Resolution ALJ-180 a Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting to consider this matter may be held upon the request of any Commissioner. If that occurs, the Commission will prepare and mail an agenda for the Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting 10 days before hand, and will advise the parties of this fact, and of the related ex parte communications prohibition period.
The Commission may act at the regular meeting on April 19, 2001, or it may postpone action until later. If action is postponed, the Commission will announce whether and when there will be a further prohibition on communications.
When the Commission acts on the proposed decision, it may adopt all or part of it as written, amend or modify it, or set it aside and prepare its own decision. Only when the Commission acts does the decision become binding on the parties.
Parties to the proceeding may file comments on the draft decision as provided in Article 19, attached, of the Commission's "Rules of Practice and Procedure." Pursuant to Rule 77.3 opening comments shall not exceed 15 pages. Finally, comments must be served separately on the ALJ and the assigned Commissioner, and for that purpose I suggest hand delivery, overnight mail, or other expeditious method of service.
________________________
Lynn T. Carew, Chief
Administrative Law Judge
LTC:sid
ALJ/MFG/sid DRAFT Item 2
4/19/2001
Decision PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ GALVIN (Mailed 3/6/2001)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for (i) Authority to Establish Its Authorized Rates of Return on Common Equity and for Electric Distribution and Gas Distribution for Year 2001, and (ii) Adoption of an Annual Cost of Capital Adjustment Mechanism. (U 39 M) |
Application 00-05-013 (Filed May 8, 2000) |
Shirley Woo, Attorney at Law, for Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, applicant.
James Weil, for Aglet Consumer Alliance; Department of Navy, by Norman J. Furuta, Attorney at Law, for Federal Executive Agencies; and Ron Knecht and Ray Czahar, for themselves; interested parties.
Robert C. Cagen, Attorney at Law, for the Office of Ratepayer
Advocates.
Title Page
O P I N I O N 2
I. Summary 2
II. Jurisdiction 2
III. Request 3
IV. Proceeding Type 3
V. Prehearing Conference 3
VI. Presiding Officer and Scope of Proceeding 4
VII. Customer Notice 4
VIII. Evidentiary Hearings 4
IX. A Fair Return 5
X. Capital Structure 6
XI. Forecast of Interest Rates 7
XII. Return on Common Equity 9
A. Analytical Methods 9
B. Risk Factors 11
1. PG&E 12
a) Electric Distribution Operations 12
b) Gas Distribution Operations 13
c) Summary 16
2. Aglet 16
3. FEA 17
4. Knecht and Czahar 17
a) Flotation cost 17
b) Time Weighted Retention Ratio 18
c) Daily Betas 18
5. ORA 19
6. Subsequent Events 19
C. Conclusion 21
XIII. ROE Implementation 25
XIV. Automatic Trigger Mechanism 25
XV. Test Year 2002 Cost of Capital Application 26
XVI. Comments on Proposed Decision 27
Title Page
Findings of Fact 27
Conclusions of Law 29
ORDER 31
APPENDIX A - Table of Acronyms and Abbreviations
APPENDIX B - List of Official Notice Items
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is authorized a 11.22% Return of Equity (ROE) for its 2001 test year. This authorized ROE results in a corresponding 9.12% return on rate base and no change in PG&E's electric or gas revenue requirement for 2001.
We deny PG&E's request to replace its annual cost of capital filing with an automatic trigger mechanism at this time. We also defer PG&E's scheduled May 8, 2001 cost of capital filing until the earlier of May 8, 2002 or upon the assigned Commissioner directing PG&E to file.
PG&E's adopted capital structure for 2001 is summarized as follows:
Weighted | |||
Ratio |
Cost |
Cost | |
Long-Term Debt |
46.20% |
7.27% |
3.36% |
Preferred Stock |
5.80 |
6.56 |
0.38 |
Common Equity |
48.00 |
11.22 |
5.38 |
Total |
100.00% |
9.12% | |